Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Only the Good Spy Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 14:38, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Only the Good Spy Young

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find reliable sources (ie. professional reviews). Danger High voltage! 15:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep In July, 2010 the book was listed as a USA Today bestseller, see . I found two good reviews: (National Post, probably not a "professional review", but it was published by a notable newspaper),  (School Library Journal). --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 17:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * These are really limited in scope, barely more than listings. Danger High voltage! 17:28, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm aware of that. The book also placed second in the 2010 Goodreads Choice Award (section 'Young adult fiction') . I don't think it is a totally unnotable book and in my opinion it would be better to keep the information. I admit that this is a borderline case.--Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 17:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources found above. Jclemens (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - it has reliable reviews and it was on a bestseller list so it passes notability, but the plot section is waaaaaaaaay too long. --Madison-chan (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.