Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onnaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  08:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Onnaman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep : The movie was released 20 years ago and starred Mohanlal, who is probably the biggest actor in Malayalam cinema. It is impossible to find reviews that are online now, though considering the star cast and crew, it is evident that the movie was reviewed in all mainstream publications. I was able to find a review which is still online from Sify - . There is also an online version of the printed matter detailing the controversies in the movie and its huge financial loss from Mathrubhumi - . There are also multiple mentions of the movie in multiple Rediff articles before its release -, . The movie's failure has also been mentioned in other articles about the star actor - , and in a zillion articles about Pranav Mohanlal which can be found by a casual search. Merits a keep.  Jupitus Smart  14:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above such as the sifi review, rediff and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.