Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onset Computer Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Onset Computer Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has had a 'notability' tag hanging over it since 2012 and an attempt to speedy delete this article in 2013 was turned down with a suggestion to "take this to AfD". Hence here it is. Though this data logging company claims to have been in existence since 1981, I can't see any particular claims of significance. The sources are largely 'stuff on the internet', with no general news coverage to help it pass the WP:NCORP notability threshold. Time for it to go? Sionk (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can only find a few industry publications. Nothing of significance to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 00:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - created by single-purpose account and retains promotional tone. I can't find any in-depth coverage in secondary sources - not notable. Run of the mill article spam. Citobun (talk) 13:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. promotional article with trivial references.  DGG ( talk ) 09:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.