Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontario Weather Service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Ontario Weather Service

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Originally tagged for AfD a few days ago, but not followed through. I removed the tag and cleaned up the article, but have been unable to find any reliable, third-party sources for it. It does exist, clearly, but of the first 5 pages of a Google search, there is nothing but forums, linkfarms, advertising and YouTube videos - nothing independent or talking about the site itself. The only exception is a bare mention on the National Weather Service's website, but this is also just a link, not any form of commentary. So I'm proposing we delete the article as lacking notability for inclusion. People may wish to refer to the previous version before I cleaned up, which had a rambling, referenceless history of the site which I removed. ➔ REDVEЯS is standing in the dark 11:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with the deletion. This "Ontario Weather Service" article here in Wikipedia was written as an advertisement.  To me I think of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia.  In encyclopedias, factual definitions are given not advertisements for products and services. Socalweatherbuff (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. GoodDay (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as failing WP:RS. -Djsasso (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Altairisfar talk  02:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N, no third-party reliable sources. Hut 8.5 07:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 17:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.