Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onterio Varrio Sur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Onterio Varrio Sur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded this article as "almost entirely unsourced", with serious reliability and BLP issues. Another editor deprodded it, removing much of the content and adding "sources". However, these are all unreliable, and all bar one appear to be to a mirror of the original article.

The article does not establish the notability of this group, nor anything else except that it exists. The (apparently reliable) source confirming its existence contradicts most of the other information in the article. RolandR (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

The article also appears to suffer from a severe attack of sock-puppetry; I have identified at least a dozen IPs and SPAs which have edited only this article, often making the same or a very similar edit, and which have disappeared after a day. RolandR (talk) 17:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no significant coverage of the organization found in multiple non-primary reliable sources that indicate that the group is notable per WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Subject has received two brief mentions in news sources, however that is not sufficient to indicate notability.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment "Onterio" may be a variation on the city name of Ontario used by the gang, but RSs may be found by changing search term to "Ontario Varrio Sur". Just a thought. Boogerpatrol (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have a couple possible sources here, http://www.scpr.org/news/2010/04/21/14375/black-angels, http://lang.sbsun.com/socal/gangs/articles/ivdbp1_main.asp, and http://www.justice.gov/usao/cac/Pressroom/pr2010/073.html someone care to evaluate? Boogerpatrol (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 22:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Looking at news sources of "Ontario Varrio Sur", one will find mostly passing mentions; the San Bernardino Sun article has five one to two short sentence paragraphs regarding the subject of this AfD, it does not appear to be significant coverage.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Google produces almost nothing of note on this group. WP:ORG demands some significant discussion by independent sources.  Absent that, it should be deleted. --Noleander (talk) 05:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.