Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onward for Future 4.0


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Onward for Future 4.0

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is about provisional political organization #1, and no have relevant references. --Garam (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  TheAwesome  Hwyh  02:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Appears to have 6 references, but all in Korean, so I cant evaluate them.Rathfelder (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * @Rathfelder: Of course, this article have 6 references. But 2 of them are WP:RSSELF, and I think anothers are WP:QUESTIONABLE. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It should be keep. This party held founding ceremony at Jan 19, 2020 and Officially registered as a party at Jan 22, 2020. Officially registered party with a seat in National assembly is notable. --2001:2D8:EA40:AEB4:0:0:BA48:3002 (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:NGO, NGO has 2 requirements "activities is national or international in scale" and "significant coverage." They political party holds office in the National Assembly, which is half of what NGO requires for notability. Unfortunately, I can't read the sources but there is 6 of them, and at least 5 of those sources are from different organizations. That appears to be adequate for "significant coverage." Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 08:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * @Barkeep49: I think 5 references are not WP:NEWSORG. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep the party is represented in the Gukhoe and the next elections will make it even more popular probably. --Arkansawyer25KADIMA (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep A search on Naver reveals fairly extensive coverage of party alliances, leadership, and platform. There seems to be a large volume of mentions being published daily, as well, as sorting the articles by most recent will reveal. The article needs expansion beyond the skeletal state it's in now, but the subject seems soundly notable. I'm not sure I'm familiar enough with the Korean political system (or the Korean language) to trust my ability to add coherently to the article, so I hope someone with more expertise can help improve it. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.