Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onyeka Nnadozie Eze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Onyeka Nnadozie Eze

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is not notable. Case of WP:REFBOMB with references discussing his "foundation" instead. Being a philanthropist is not enough claim to notability. Mahveotm (talk) 07:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 07:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mahveotm (talk) 07:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep It is very clear that you didn't perform a WP:BEFORE before nominating this article for deletion. This source from This Day Newspaper is independent of the subject and is enough to pass WP:GNG and receiving a notable award such as World Habitat Awards as can be seen from this Vanguard Newspaper source is enough to pass WP:ANYBIO. — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 08:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Mahveotm's rationale here. The subject does not appear to have a career to speak of and is only known for being the head of a non-notable organization that takes pride in philanthropy. Majority of the article's sources are about the subject's foundation and not about him. Companies are not notable simply because they donate hefty sum of money to different initiatives. He is a recipient of the World Habitat Awards but I don't think this is enough to warrant stand-alone inclusion.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 13:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete neither the award nor anything else shows notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the Versace1608 rationale, the subject of the article obviously failed WP:GNG. Em-mustapha talk  11:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.