Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oodle Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete g11, (not-very-well) disguised advertising for one artist's work. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Oodle Art

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non- notable neologism. This article reads like an essay concerning a vague new-age-ish theory of art that has not received any notable coverage and seems to be elaborated only by one Mark Broder. This is neither a notable movement nor a notable theory.  Litho  derm  18:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. –  Litho  derm  18:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Major neologism, non-notable term. Angryapathy (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.