Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ooh La La (The Dirty Picture song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Ooh La La (The Dirty Picture song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

not notable thus fails WP:NSONG -  Vivvt Talk 17:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't even try to assert any notability. Article for the film it came from said it was released to the Internet and also says nothing about its notability. I don't think a redirect is necessary as the title as written is not one people would likely search on Wikipedia for, and Google searches would most likely bring up the film page anyway. DreamGuy (talk) 20:02, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. In its current form, this unsourced stub merely repeats info already provided in the article for the film it's from. Following WP:NSONG, for it to be worthwhile having a separate article on the song, there should be substantial coverage from reliable sources and there should be "enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". It's possible both these conditions could hold for this song, but it is not obvious. I'd suggest no prejudice against recreation with real content and real sourcing, but nothing is lost by deleting article in its current form. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  17:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons as given above. There's nothing in this article that isn't in the article for the film. - Coolcool2012 (talk to me)  18:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has since been updated with numerous plausible claims of notability—namely that the number (including the music and the accompanying choreography) won nine separate awards from six industry bodies. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  20:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article has been updated with Reception,awards and it has been also been updated with many things 13:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is the 7th edit of User on English Wikipedia and the user also shows similarities in editing to the blocked creator of this article User . §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  14:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Confirmed puppet. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Clearly no indication of notability.The same information exists on the article of movie. Max Viwe  &#124;  Viwe The Max  14:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NSONGS (although I liked the video, what a shame I am voting for deletion :)-- D Big X ray  11:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I'm guessing that there are several Bollywood songs out there which do not fall under the notability guideline. Secret of success  ( talk )  15:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Although there seems to be many awards for the singers, choreographers and other associated people, no notable award is won by the song itself. We can't blame that on the song as no such notable award exists. However had the "song" received any critical acclaims from notable sources it would have had a chance to stay. Also the article as of now and most likely in future too would never have anything more to tell than what the film's article does. Hence delete. No redirect required as the title doesn't seem like someone would search. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ  00:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is really a famous song here but anyhow, not so notable. It fails WP:NSONG.  →TSU tp* 03:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.