Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oops! I Did It Again: The Best of Britney Spears (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. j⚛e deckertalk 04:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Oops! I Did It Again: The Best of Britney Spears
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Severely lacking in reliable sources. The only proper coverage appears in a Yahoo! article and a brief AllMusic review; I do not consider Mstarz or Idolator to be reliable. The Yahoo! article also cites a tweet from Sony Music indicating that they are unaware of this album's existence, which raises concerns about whether or not this is a bootleg release. (NALBUM states that "Unreleased material (including ... bootlegs ...) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources.")

Several "keep" !voters at the last AfD claimed that all of Spears' other albums have articles and this should be kept for completeness. However, several of Spears' compilations do not have articles. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Inviting Status, Arre 9, Ritchie333, Tomica, and Dralwik back from the previous discussion. (Others appear to be inactive.) –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Not sure about MStarz but Idolator, published by Gawker Media, is most certainly a reliable source. Also not to avoid are AllMusic and Yahoo! MaRAno '' FAN 09:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Idolator is listed as a reliable source under WP:ALBUM/SOURCES. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. However, the content from that source doesn't add much to the article, and my other comments still apply. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.