Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ootmat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 17:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Ootmat

 * Delete: Information does not seem valid, found only one result on yahoo.com, does not seem credible. Phaldo 00:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Non-notable made-up holiday with a constituency of one. Adrian Lamo 00:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Adrian. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Rudykog 01:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense and hoax. Blnguyen 01:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax. Johntex\talk 02:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as bollocks Segv11 (talk/contribs) 09:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete holidaycruft. Cyde Weys votetalk 15:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 22:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable,unverifiable,original research. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 05:24Z 
 * Delete nn, hoax - [[Image:Union flag 1606 (Kings Colors).svg|20px|UK]] «ßØÛ®ßÖÑ§3» T 17:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.