Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oozaru

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Final vote tally is 6 clear keep votes, 3 clear merge votes, 2 to keep or merge, 3 clear delete votes (this is counting GRider's nomination as one) and 1 to merge or delete. That is 15 votes in total, and 8 of them say "keep" or "keep or merge". Sjakkalle 10:18, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oozaru
Manga-cruft? With 756 matches on Google, what could possibly be written about this subject which would illustrate encyclopedic notability? GRider\talk 01:04, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, not notable, fancruft. Megan1967 01:09, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge, necessary to adequate coverage of Dragonball Kappa 01:23, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. you should google Dragonball not Dragon Ball, you'd get 8,240 hits. Kappa 01:25, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable DBZcruft. ComCat 02:26, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with main DBZ article. Radiant! 09:55, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Saiyan. (Same should probably happen to Halfbreed Saiyan.) -- Antaeus Feldspar 15:39, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. The notion is important enough in the show's mythos, but perhaps it does not need its own article.Sinistro 16:16, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Quite a decent article considering the subject. Seems too large to merge anyway. Xezbeth  17:22, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge, as good as the article is, the subject of it is extremely unnotable in the grand scheme of things. Grue 20:00, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --Phred Levi 23:51, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. 756 hits seems notable enough to me; that is, if I bought into the concept of notability being a requirement for inclusion.  It sure isn't listed on teh deletion policy, so why is it considered here?  Delist; invalid nomination.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 07:50, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, needs refs - David Gerard 17:42, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with main DBZ article. While I have less than zero interest in DBZ, I can recognise a good article when I see one. Denni &#9775; 01:45, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
 * Merge with main DBZ topic. --Oarias 23:55, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)