Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opal Tometi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect as this seems best for now (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  06:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Opal Tometi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No third-party coverage outside of Black Lives Matter, so merge with that page.--JudgeJason (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am finding some coverage for her - it is primarily for her work with the BLM movement, but it's there. (See this news story.) I'm kind of unsure at the moment whether or not this should be redirected, given that she was on the movers and shakers list of a notable publication and there are some stories that focus more directly on her. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  14:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge: with Black Lives Matter per nominator. -O.R.Comms 03:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * comment "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." & invited to speak at Smithsonian Institution and Aspen Institute = significant critical attention. Duckduckstop (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Neither of those invitations is critical attention and she's an activist, not an artist anyways.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge as per nomination.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.