Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open-AudIT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Open-AudIT

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails the notability guideline for products. PROD was contested in 2013 by obvious COI editor. See also AfDs for its supporting company Opmantek and its other software NMIS. – Teratix ₵ 12:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 12:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: Obviously promotion  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Clearly, promotional. Clearly. -- Whiteguru (talk) 12:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 00:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.