Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open2.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Open University. Sounds like relocating some information from OpenLearn into Open University is also a good idea, but I'll leave that up to other people to implement. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Open2.net

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT or WP:GNG, as per source searches. North America1000 02:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to OpenLearn which itself requires non-primary sources. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 04:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Delete or redirect (to where)?
 * Delete -- no relevant encyclopedic content and no sources. Regarding a redirect, it's not clear if the target should not be Open University over OpenLearn, because only the content was transferred to OpenLearn, while Open University had more of a role in the site. So better off deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  10:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * BBC Online seems to be the main article about the BBC's online activities and a merge or mention there might work, as the site was tied in with several programs broadcast on BBC (even if they were made by Open2/the OU). I added one ref, and there's a few refs in educational texts, but probably not enough to meet WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect I would suggest redirecting to Open University with merged information from Open Learn as it's own section. Aimeec110 (talk) 23:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.