Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenAttendee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 22:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

OpenAttendee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject is not notable. No external, third-party references are cited, and from a quick search on my part, I haven't been able to find any information on this platform that is substantial enough to cover notability requirements. csaribay (talk) 00:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to notability, no outside sources Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As above. 8 ghits if you subtract the 2 wiki entries. An emerging standard should get some momentum and coverage before creating an entry. Take a look at some of the other technology standards covered by short articles like 10BROAD36, which has about 8000 gits. --Faradayplank (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.