Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenCart (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 01:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

OpenCart
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Is not notable enough.Jamie Shaw (talk) 07:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per utter lack of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN    7   talk   08:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability provided. GF news archive and web searches identify no significant coverage in reliable sources. Bongo  matic  09:30, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete provides no reliable sources, does not assert notability. Quick searches of Google and Google News do not provide significant coverage by reliable sources. Kn  Cv 2 13:05, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Pretty much the same analysis as in the last AfD: I personally would like to keep this page but I can't justify doing so in the absence of reliable sources, which I've been unable to find. There is evidence that people are using this software; search for "powered by OpenCart": .  However, outside of this one Italian-language source (which I can't read):  I can't find anything other than blog or forum posts and the project's homepage.  This is not enough to provide notability.  The blog/forum posts I read also commented that there isn't a very big support community for the software, which would reinforce that it is not notable.  Cazort (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability, barely any context, and being a web application doesn't make you notable - otherwise, I'll write an article about the spider near the front door - at least its web application is doing something useful... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's not notable but I dispute your claim that this application is not "doing something useful"...the web search I showed above does demonstrate that a large number of online stores are using this product. But this is irrelevant to the notability discussion--it doesn't matter whether or not it's used, it matters whether its use has been documented in reliable sources, which it hasn't.  Cazort (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.