Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenCloth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete: original author blanked the page hence deleted per WP:CSD  AngelOfSadness  talk  15:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

OpenCloth

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Computer program with little claim of or sources supporting notability. ZZArch talk to me 10:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC) How can I provide the claim of/sources supporting notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmovania (talk • contribs) 10:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmm two questions 1) How do I provide the claim of notability? 2) As I told you before, I am the owner of the project and the whole content hosted on the http://code.google.com/p/opencloth page. You can verify this by looking through the samples which clearly state in the license that I am the owner of it. Moreover, you can also check that all the commits are being done by me (mmmovania). 3) The project was highlighted in the news on OpenGL.org(http://www.opengl.org/news/permalink/opencloth-a-collection-of-source-codes-implementing-cloth-simulation-algori/) and Geeks3D(http://www.geeks3d.com/20110825/opencloth-a-collection-of-cloth-simulation-algorithms/), the two premier website for realtime graphics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmovania (talk • contribs) 10:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Source above appears to be press-release- use of "We" is a giveaway. Does not have the coverage required to establish notability. And obviously promotional in tone. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Creator of page is repeatedly blanking and obviously wants out, so I think we can Speedy this one. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.