Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenElement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  07:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

OpenElement

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. Existing article contains one reference to the subject's website, Was PRODed, but the template was removed without addressing concerns. Greenman (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Contested PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Greenman (talk) 10:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 15:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: The PROD was opposed by an IP on an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS basis, which is not sustainable here. Searches for Element Technologie and openElement find a couple of product reviews (BetaNews (2013), Softpedia (2017)) which praise the product's range of templates, but do not indicate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 05:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.