Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenLuna (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

OpenLuna
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only covered in a primary source. No updates since 2012, even on their web site (latest is a blog entry from July 2013). Did not attract enough attention from RS to pass GNG. — JFG talk 21:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * On closer inspection, this should be speedy-deleted for violating several CSD provisions:
 * CSD G4: recreation of a previously-deleted article
 * CSD G5: created by a blocked user
 * CSD G12: blatant copyright violation of the primary source at http://openluna.org/missions
 * I will however keep the AfD page open instead of tagging the article, and let an admin decide what is the best course of action. — JFG talk 21:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Delete: Article was created by a user blocked indefinitely for long-term abuse. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The articles only source is self-published and appears to be about a defunct organization. Material in the article is also a blatant copywrite violation of the primary source. The article was also recreated by a banned editor. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.