Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenPAT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

OpenPAT

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see any evidence of reliable source third-party notability for this open-source academic software project. All of the coverage appears to be from primary sources (i.e., authored by the creator of this project). The relatively few (~1k) Google hits don't help the cause either. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as WP:ADMASQ and per lack of notability. Esquivalience t 01:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 02:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now at best until a better article can be made and that's interesting to say because this was accepted via AfC in November 2013 and not much has improved. SwisterTwister   talk  03:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.