Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenPBX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 23:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

OpenPBX


OpenPBX

Potential name conflict and dispute and lacking WP:CORP. See full discussion here Articles for deletion/OpenPBX by Voicetronix. Calltech 14:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article might be recreated after legal disputes about the names are resolved, but WP should not be a part of the battle. Doc  Tropics  20:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a valid disambiguation page. Legal battles are irrelevant to wikipedia here. Even if some of these companies will be banned from using this name, we will still have legal rigths to write "formerly known as..." or "errom]neously known as..." or something.`'mikkanarxi 21:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC) `'mikkanarxi 21:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid dab page, no legal problem apparent here, factual reporting on the usage of terms is not an infringement on anything. Sandstein 22:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep As long as at least one of the refered pages exist this is a valid dab page. Those should be judged on their own merits. Dimitrii 16:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.