Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenSwarm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments for this article's retention have been made in over 1 week. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 23:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

OpenSwarm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No substantial Google books hits. A single Google scholar hit, which is a law journal article discussing the project's choice of free software license. No hits on Google News. Not finding sufficient RS on this open source project to establish notability. SJK (talk) 03:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SJK (talk) 03:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per SJK LavaBaron (talk) 06:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a recently released software, too soon. SwisterTwister   talk  05:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.