Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenXL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

OpenXL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established. None of the given references mention OpenXL, and a web search turns up nothing but the website (the content of which is remarkably similar to this page). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Found this from IBM. Not necessarily making a comment about notability. Stickee (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's an unrelated technology with the same name. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 10:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * delete. Far too little to establish notability. Even its web page makes it look like something someone did for a conference eight years ago which was promptly forgotten about. Searches turn up many things with the same name, none obviously supporting this's notability.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 05:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.