Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Company License


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to BSD licenses.  MBisanz  talk 01:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Open Company License

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is the modified BSD software license used by the E Text Editor. It is used exclusively by the E Text Editor and has has no notability independent of that editor. The text of the article consists almost wholly of the text of the license. No sources are given. --darolew 23:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge with BSD licenses. Minimal content, no references. Does not assert notability on its own.--It's me...Sallicio!$\color{Red} \oplus$ 00:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added some references but a merge with BSD licenses does seem appropriate.Tjwallace87 (talk) 22:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect The sources are not independent and the article largely copies text from the license itself. It's a viable search term, but nothing worth merging. - Mgm|(talk) 08:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with BSD licenses, as above. Dialectric (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - What is there to merge? --Unionhawk Talk 22:59, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.