Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Containers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Open Containers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Coverage seems limited to self-published references and mirrors of Wikipedia. I'd dispute the factual accuracy of some of the claims made in the article, but after all it's the subject that's being evaluated, not the article itself. decltype (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Subject does not appear to have any reliable sources covering it. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing establishes notability, no third party sources. Miami33139 (talk) 18:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources wouldn't fix the problem as the article does not assert notability. A well-sourced topic can still be non-notable where it makes no claim to being other than run-of-the-mill.  See WP:MILL and WP:EXIST. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.