Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open English


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Open English

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination for User:70.208.21.233, whose edit-summary rationale was "wikiepdia is not for company bios and ads, this is not notable." I am neutral. Ansh666 02:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 22.  — cyberbot I  Notify Offline 17:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  17:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete this as WP:PROMOTIONAL while welcoming its eventual organic reconstitution BlueSalix (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The tone of the article doesn't strike me as particularly problematic, but as far as I can tell, all many of the sources come from the company or its advertisements or business profiles. Notability is not established. Cnilep (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe in five years. There is little substance in this article, and no indication of cultural relevance. It reads like the "History" or "About us" page on a corporate website. The advertisements section seems like a weird PR thing. Ringbang (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.