Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Mine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Open-pit mining. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 09:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Open Mine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks substantial rs coverage. Zero independent refs. Created by an spa. Tagged for notability since August. Epeefleche (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Open-pit mining? The self-described "corporate magazine" is non-notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Clarityfiend; I see no coverage to prove that this magazine qualifies for a Wikipedia article, but the title is a likely error for open-pit mine. Nyttend (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete then Redirect to Open-pit mining per Clarityfiend.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.