Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2 city ‽ 03:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Open Source College

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

For a school which is supposed to be "the first institute in Taguig, Philippines, that teaches open-source technology" it is reasonable that a reliable third-party source would at least report on this. However no such source could be retrieved. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 09:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the article is un-referenced, clearly promotional, and I couldn't find anything about the "college" (there's zero evidence in the article that it's an actual college or university) when I did a WP:BEFORE. So this clearly fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Let alone the general notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced and a Google search turns up items about open sources being used in schools in general, though nothing about this institution. Oaktree b (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable third party sources found during Google Search. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think this could have been suitable for a speedy deletion. There’s no references on the article, nothing independent on the web and it has very strong tendencies towards being an advert. Why else would someone write about a topic that no one knows about and there’s basically no proof of it’s existence? GeekBurst (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.