Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Source for the Enterprise: Managing Risks, Reaping Rewards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Open Source for the Enterprise: Managing Risks, Reaping Rewards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable business book by two non-notable writers. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  03:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I haven't found any source strong enough to showcase notability. I may revisit this later. — ΛΧΣ  21  07:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete; This article is a marketing sheet for an opinion/editorial in book form, for content which has currency of about 6 months at best. It belongs on a website intended for those who are looking to BUY a book.  It is NOT encyclopedic in nature.
 * Mark Bestland (talk) 02:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: It doesn't even indicate being a notable book; it looks almost like an Amazon page. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 14:22, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY Delete - puffery and spam. The title is just amazing. Get rid of this. This should have been speedied.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * reply - it wasn't spammy enough for a speedy deletion as spam; and there is no non-notability category for speedy deletion of books, films, products, foods, etc. the way there is for websites, people, and organizations. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Plus, fails WP:SNOW PianoDan (talk) 13:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.