Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opening of the depots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge. I don't actually see a reason to delete this presented at all, so I must agree with Cola that this was not an appropriate candidate for AFD and this is a WP:SPEEDYKEEP, but consensus clearly favors a merge so that's what we will go with. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Opening of the depots

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Suggest a merge with 1997 rebellion in Albania, as this doesn't appear to support enough content separate and apart from the 1997 rebellion to justify an article.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  06:16, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 07:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you want to request a merge, see Merging and don't bring articles to AfD. AfD is for articles you want deleted in their entirety. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I'm not sure a merge is necessary, I personally would rather up and delete it, however whenever nominate things for deletion, people ask for a merge, so I figure I'd at least offer. I'll be clear: I think this ought to be deleted, but if someone wants to merge, that's an acceptable second choice.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  04:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge for now - The article contains useful information so it certainly should not be deleted but there is little content for a detailed article. Merge for now with no prejudice against future creation. SwisterTwister   talk  20:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.