Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operating Cameraman Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Society of Operating Cameramen. Randykitty (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Operating Cameraman Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG as a subject with too little coverage and too few WP:RS. Search on subject only resulted in passing mentions, or obviously unreliable sources (like Answers.com). Mr. Guye (talk) 17:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to Society of Operating Cameramen. It's mentioned there, and another clause or two would not be inappropriate.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge - yeah, that seems sensible. I don't think it's notable enough on its own to justify an article but we can include it elsewhere in passing.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge to Society of Operating Cameramen, a reasonable WP:ATD in this instance. NorthAmerica1000 10:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.