Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation 786


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Operation 786

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. There is one article in Nai Baat that may or may not be a reliable source and which summarizes the plot, some translations of that article into English, and some trivial or unreliable sources. That's not enough for an encyclopedia article. This appears to be someone's home-made pet project, not a notable film. Huon (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Kindly explain how the article is nominated for deletion? It has references from news & media, but someone put the deletion reference. Kindly check & remove this tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 11:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I see a bunch of sources discussing the film. Seems to have been on the festival circuit. Legacypac (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello i have added references of many website but you have selected nai baat lemme tell you nai baat is a newspaper & its tv channel is neo news so can you deny? I've added reference from hamari web https://enews.hamariweb.com/entertainment/praising-pakistan-army-by-animated-film-operation-786/

it is showing in google news but you are not talking about this. Also I've added beam.pk, video street & others.

Kindly don't insult by having saying that its home project etc as this project is shown in government places & featured in government websites & newspapers.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 18:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 20:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom – I regret that I do not read Urdu, but have failed to find any coverage in the languages that I do read. One blog-source hit on Gnews, no verifiable hits on Gbooks., you say that you found sources, but I don't see that you have added them to the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I was just commenting on the sources already attached to the article. Legacypac (talk) 22:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Dear editors The references are in english & urdu & i think thats enough to show that movie is notable & if not kindly tell me why this film wikipedia is still live? It has no news in google & only one reference & else are wordpress reference then why this page was approved? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buz-e-Chini

My article has references of hamariweb, nai baat, hum sub, beam & various & all are notable.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 09:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

As you said film is not showing on Google Books how films can be shown in Gbooks? Its an animated film not GBooks if its Wikipedia policy that film should come in Gbooks then I'm sorry you need to delete thousands of articles now because i investigate all before writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 09:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comments: The tone of the article is possibly a confusion of translation but "showing positive image of Pakistan", "in which innocent peoples martyred", and "film is showing positive image (Beauty Of Pakistan)" includes words of bias that is counter to WP:NPOV. I do not know the usual proper foreign wording but innocent people are killed or murdered as the unsourced "martyred" advances "a person who is put to death or endures great suffering on behalf of any belief, principle, or cause". Otr500 (talk) 04:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per unsigned comments of User:MemonBhai, "this project is shown in government places & featured in government websites & newspapers" as evidence of propaganda. Otr500 (talk) 04:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.