Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Geronimo name controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily kept under criterion 1. Discussion about a possible merger is an editorial matter best suited for the respective article talk pages. Non-admin closure. Serpent&#39;s Choice (talk) 19:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Operation Geronimo name controversy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page was blanked by another user : see this diff. Let us hear more community voices on whether these contents should be kept or deleted. I think this topic is important enough. So I am in favor of keeping. Teofilo talk  14:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * keep having a separate article enables to include it as an item of category:Native American topics. Teofilo talk  14:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Given that a merge would be ill advised given the size of the main article. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per criterion #1. Nominator has failed to advance an argument for deletion and has in fact advocated a "keep" position. The article talk page or even RfC would be a more appropriate forum for this type of discussion. Even if such a discussion were to result in a consensus that a separate article is not needed, a redirect would be better than outright deletion. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as no argument has been advanced for deletion. --John (talk) 16:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep; same reasons as Dr. Blofeld and Teofilo
 * Merge into Death of Osama bin Laden. There really isn't that much here for a real article.--RaptorHunter (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep without having actually reviewed the subject since nom is in favor of keeping. Unless another deletion rationale is presented, this is just WP:POINT - frankieMR (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Remember remember the sixth of May, the naming treason and bungle. - I know of no reason, the naming treason should ever be forgot. Seriously though, this is somewhat notable and should be kept and the nominator is of course advocating the keep (undoubtedly to reinforce the article being here, which is good). Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 17:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.