Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Pillar of Cloud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per 'WP:CSK. (non-admin closure) Ryan Vesey 03:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Operation Pillar of Cloud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As a new current event, this topic fails criteria #1 of Wikipedia policy Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Nominating this article for deletion per this policy at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Major issue on all news sites. I propose this afd be closed as per WP:SNOW. Unflavoured (talk) 01:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  01:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Hard to assess whether this event will be of significance in the future, but looking for prior similar events, I found March 2012 Gaza–Israel clashes, which doesn't appear (from the talk page) to have been through AfD, but was assessed by a member of WikiProject Israel to be a Start class article. (Pointing this out to highlight that the assessing editor did not AfD that article when they assessed the article.)  Easier to AfD/merge this a month from now than to delete current info and recreate if it is of significance.  At the very least, this should merge with Israel–Gaza conflict instead of being a pure delete.--Policy Reformer(c) 01:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Most significant military escalation in the area for years; already undoubtedly notable.  Notability likely to grow greater with time.  Encyclopedic details can already be conveyed in this article, it's not just a rehashing of news headlines.  Of all the AfD's I've seen opened in similar situations, I don't think I've seen one actually close as delete. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The conflict is likely to escalate. It's should definitely be kept for now. If it's over tomorrow, I guess we can merge this to the main Israeli-Gaza conflict article.-- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 02:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep major event in the ongoing Israeli-Gaza conflict timeline. Will have major international consequences if it continues to escalates. --   Luke      (Talk)   02:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Major international event; WP:NOT would apply to otherwise non-notable subjects. 99.0.80.70 (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I understand the desire to delete given the blatantly Israeli POV, but readers just need to understand that there is a disproportionate number of editors on Wikipedia who are pro-Israeli military, so much so that articles like these do not differ much from official Israeli military and U.S. press releases.  Mr G (talk) 02:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep summarizing ongoing events is one of the things Wikipedia does best. GabrielF (talk) 03:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:CSK: The article is currently linked from the Main Page. If someone else wants to confirm this and close it as such; it doesn't require an admin to do so.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 03:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.