Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Tigris Shield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Operation Claw (2019–2020). Nobody argued that this page should be kept as a separate article. The relevant content has already been copied to the target. EdJohnston (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Operation Tigris Shield

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Operation Tigris Shield appears in just one of the sources in English. Arabic I don't know. Tigris alone as well. The content here could also go to Timeline of the Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Why is the page blanked while we discuss migration of content to another page, and that exact issue has just been opened on this article's talkpage hours prior ? Is there any gain to skip the talkpage, blank the page containing sourced statements and rush to RfD ? Yug (talk)  20:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The page is not useful. Use the edit history to migrate content. You know how this works? Just push the edit button and copy what ever you see as useful. If you don't know how to do it, I do it for you if you figured out what article you want to have it.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It's just procedural, but from my experience the standard practice is to tag the article issues with warning templates, call contributors to move content from source article to target. Not to blank it right away, which risk definitive content loss. Content other contributors spend time to gather.
 * It would also sound wise to let some time to discuss what to do with that content. It seems there are enough contents and sources in this article to create a short article "Turkish airstrike on ..." (March 2018), or to move content to chronology pages. On the other hand, blanking the page early or the RfD adds unecessary « fish-it-back before discussing it » burden to that process.
 * Wikipedia spirit of concensus also recommend to have some open discussion on this matter rather than pushing for one volunteer to unilaterally decide that. Yug (talk)  14:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I moved the relevant content to the Timeline of the Kurdish Turkish conflict see here for the diff. One phrase was from October and I took it out as it was within articles between March and May. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank for the bulk migration. Note: I think there is an error since a good part of the events were from 2018, but have been moved to the 2019 section (if i am reading your diff correctly). Yug (talk)  11:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because the subject is currently redirecting to Operation Claw (2019–2020).
 * Current redirect ↪ Operation Claw (2019–2020)
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as a redirect This page in trwiki (with the title of Operation Stability) states that the operation is the predecessor of the current redirected page, however it seems like it didn't get enough coverage to warrant an article, but notable enough to keep as redirect. This Google search gave me nine results mentioning the phrase. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.