Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Underworld (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Operation Underworld (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable book by non-notable writer." Article de-PRODded after addition of a single short review. Does not meet WP:NBOOKS, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A
 * Comment, uh,oh, according to WorldCat less then 25 libraries holding this title, found a review by the Historical Novel Society here but will need more. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 09:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, the 2 reviews linked in the article and here are all that exist. Book is not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this book has two book reviews then it satisfies NBOOK. I personally would accept one because I don't think there is any point in requiring multiple sources. James500 (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.