Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opor Ayam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Opor Ayam

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No notability and impractical to expand past a stub Supertouch (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This Google News archive search gets 374 hits. A Google web search gives 61,700 hits. And since for many of us, the gold standard of notability is an article in the New York Times, here is a recipe for Opor Ayam from that newspaper: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/01/dining/011arex.html - Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. } — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. } — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  01:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Articles like these are not what google or any non Indonesian search engine or reference is of much use - the food and drink articles that exist in the Indonesian project are very poorly referenced and poorly started - however with some careful research they can become slightly better enough to justify keeping, but only if researched and if possible utilised Indonesian sources might help SatuSuro 07:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The template used to create this nomination links to 463 books which have coverage of this subject. Could the nominator please explain how none of those provide the coverage needed to demonstrate notability? Phil Bridger (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.