Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opportunity Network (matchmaking)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Opportunity Network (matchmaking)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

At first glance this looks well-sourced, however on a closer look except for one source I couldn't access none of them are actually in-depth and independent. Nearly everything is reliant on information provided by the company's founders - the sole exception is the American Banker source which has one paragraph attributed to a third-party analyist But that by itself is nowhere near enough to support notability. Previously deleted and salted as Opportunity Network * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, Companies, Websites, Spain, England,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete All of the references fail the GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 11:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.