Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opportunity rover timeline for 2005 April


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Opportunity rover timeline for 2005 April

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

list format of article, and notability for Wikipedia's purposes (the article content is more in line with those highly interested in the project) Guroadrunner 05:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the Rover's exploits on Mars are historic. Nardman1 05:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There are companion articles to this one that were formerly deleted. I have listed them at DRV because this article is not meant to be seen by itself. The month-by-month log is linked off a main page. Nardman1 05:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If this is kept, it should be moved to "Opportunity rover timeline for April 2005". TJ Spyke 08:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and move. Needs cleanup though.  Intinn Talk! 09:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; while this mission is highly notable, we already have in-depth coverage in the proper format at Opportunity rover; a detailed diary from NASA like this isn't really encyclopedic (but might be a good candidate for Wikisource.) Krimpet 15:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Opportunity rover timeline. The previous AfD was inappropriately closed (the admin admitted that the consensus was to merge, but chose to delete instead). -- Black Falcon 01:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Move this and similar pages to subpages of Opportunity rover timeline. Too much content to merge into one page, but is also not a standalone article.  Perhaps subpages are the solution.  OscarTheCat3 21:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.