Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposite Number


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Opposite Number

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted because it is not notable. This is because it does not have any coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject. The only sources at all are Facebook posts and their official website (not independent of the subject) which fails WP:SIGCOV. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 18:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 05:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. KAP03Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions 19:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Sources are social media and the company's own website. Seems promotional. At best it's WP:TOO SOON. ShelbyMarion (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- A7 material; no indications of notability or significance. Content is advertorial in nature. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.