Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OraTaiao: New Zealand Climate and Health


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

OraTaiao: New Zealand Climate and Health

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Too close paraphrasing of. Doubt about notability due to the few hits. It mightbe a coincidence that most hits occur in the same period as the launch of this article, what might be signalling a campagne or event. Night of the Big Wind talk  11:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No indicaiton of wp:notability. Of the two reference, one is their own website, the other is to the home page of another organization, no link to the specific material within it. North8000 (talk) 13:36, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Nonprofit advocacy group which has not yet achieved the notability needed for WP:ORG. Google News search found only one reference from a Reliable Source. Not enough. --MelanieN (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for peer review, it seems notability is not met. I'll take heart from the "not yet" (better than "will never"). It is hard for small advocacy groups with no funding to get traction in Reliable Sources. This group is appropriately referenced in the Climate_change_in_New_Zealand article. George (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC).


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.