Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oral sex causes hormone deficiency in men and women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, per WP:IAR, no need to keep this hoax around for a week. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Oral sex causes hormone deficiency in men and women

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The very title of the page makes it rest on a medical claim, and a questionable one. It's a claim that would be a questionable basis for its own article even if sourced, but given the higher scrutiny called for for medical-related articles and the problems with spreading bad medical information, this article should not be allowed to stay without being properly sourced. Current version of article ends with phrase "Please note, this is from personal research and cannot be found word for word. This is 100% authentic and original." - an admission that this is WP:OR. --Nat Gertler (talk) 06:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. But I'm curious as to why there isn't an AfD template on the article (and it wasn't removed; it was never even added). Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Missing templates my fault; I was using Twinkle to setup the AfD, and Twinkle failed in some odd way, leaving bits of the process undone... and while doing various things to try to set up the proper stuff, I got called away for the night. Thanks to WHKitty for the fix. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. I just added the AfD template. --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 06:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the so called references used in the article are to sites selling pharmaceuticals, themselves without references. Arnie Side (talk) 16:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per OR and Essay concerns. Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unwikified spam essay that exemplifies exactly the sort of crackpot "original research" (using the R-word loosely) that gets the automatic gong. Should have been speedied out of here... Carrite (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Tempted to speedy it as patent nonsense, but since an AfD is already open... MastCell Talk 19:28, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.