Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrangeBlock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

OrangeBlock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software. Article was tagged as A7, however A7 does not apply to products or services. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Support iOS apps are not inherently notable. Ack! Ack! Pasta bomb! (talk) 02:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * delete as non notable Deunanknute (talk) 02:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 04:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence provided or to be found to support notability. There may be a reason for this: article claims that it "has over 100 downloads". --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 05:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete A WP:SPA article by User:Iancthompson on a game developed by one Ian Thompson. There appear to have been other similarly named games; I am seeing no evidence that this iOS game is notable. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  X201 (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Odd that CSD criteria are so specific, that there is a criteria for musical recordings, but not paintings, or books; one for companies, but not products. Either way, this fails GNG given no coverage and only ~ 100 downloads?! --Gaff (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - A7 ought to apply to products especially to non notables ones like this, Anyway per everyone above cant find any evidence of notability so fails GNG.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.