Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OrangeLogix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yet another web content management business, and every single one of them thinks they merit an article. Obvious advertising, and no claim of notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

OrangeLogix

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No claim of WP:N and I found no significant third party reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, reads like an ad for the product, probably copyvio, almost an orphan and for good reasons. Not sure why this didn't qualify for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. hamiltonstone (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.