Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 23:18, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Orange_Party
Non noticable political party. Too recent. Stub. I only found it through the Cyber_Tuesday article, which is also under AfD ^demon 17:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Junk.  Part of a triplet created by Frankencow, who will need some wiki-induction. --StuffOfInterest 17:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 17:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Approve Frankencow: Regardless of its connections to other articles, the declaration of the Orange Party's existence is valid and therefore deserves recognition. Frankencow 00:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Previous unsigned comment posted by Frankencow, the original author of the article. Also, I can't find any mention of this party's existance on Google, if there need be further proof. Most "Orange Party" results are relating to parties, food, etc. -^demon 19:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, this is Frankencow. Sorry, I forgot to add my name earlier.  This is a real political party but we do not have a website yet.  However, we should have one up shortly.  It is still in the grass roots stages of development.  Is having a google article a requirement to be included in Wikipedia? Frankencow 00:12, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment No, but it is a good indicator of whether a subject is notable enough to warrent an article -^demon 00:32, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom + Frankencow's attempt to prop up his article without showing a little bit of WP:AFD etiquette (sign your comment, use the correct voting terms, state your relation to the article if you have one....) HackJandy 21:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Who could Michael Nicholas Peter Miller be, I wonder? rodii 22:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-promoting, no candidacies, endorsements by other groups, and not even a website of their own.  (Besides, it's a stupid name; to me "Orange Party" suggests some kind of anti-Catholic religious agenda.)  Smerdis of Tlön 22:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Frankencow: How is Orange anti-Catholic? Actually, the founder of the Orange Party is practicing Roman Catholic. If I may further remind you to be patient with me as I am a newcomer, according to WP:AFD etiquette which states: Please be familiar with the policies of not biting the newcomers, Wikiquette, no personal attacks, and civility before making a recommendation as to whether the article should be deleted or not, or making a comment. Frankencow
 * When I think "Orange" and politics, the Orange Order is the first thing that comes to mind. AAR, noting this connection could not possibly be a "personal attack" unless the the article's author also came up with the name of the party. Smerdis of Tlön 04:49, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. (political) start-up advertisement. --BillC 00:52, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Since the party was started November 23, 2005 (last Wednesday), it hardly seems likely that it has achieved any level of notability. &bull;DanMS 02:06, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Also delete The Orange Party (note "The"), which is a duplicate article. Note to Frankencow: Do not create duplicate pages with similar titles. Make one article a redirect to the other. &bull;DanMS 02:13, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.