Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange Star Ultras


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Has been open for 19 days and no reliable secondary sources to determine any notability have been found, so it is reasonable to suggest that none will. Black Kite 10:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Orange Star Ultras

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable fan club for a Puerto Rican soccer team. The article makes a claim for 30 regular members; barring any evidence of reliable, independent sources materializing, that seems a paltry number of members for a notable organization of this type. Given that I can't find anything at all besides blogs and forums and social networking stuff in the relevent google search this one seems well below the inclusion criteria spelled out at WP:N. Jayron32. talk . contribs 04:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The blog Blog is their official site, from what i can gather as a Islanders fans is that they let their domain run out as their working on a new site. Size of the group is not really relevant as the only ultras group in the caribean and the first mayor supporters group on the island it has some historical value. I'll take a gander on editing the page and making it fit the criteria at WP:N. Automotivado (talk) 04:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It should be noted that self-published blogs are not sufficient to establish notability nor are they usually considered reliable sources. I see literally nothing in any source defined as reliable in WP:RS.  If you could add some reliable sources to the article, it would help!  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  12:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:52, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - under construction. I would give them a few more days to find reliable sources, or They're out! Bearian (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @978  · 22:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge the most verifiable and useful content to Puerto Rico Islanders, the team this fan club supports. Normally fan groups get covered in the article about the team they are fans of. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete notable fan clubs may get that coverage, but there is nothing to suggest this club is anything of note. Resolute 01:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Not notable in itself, and no need to have every fanclub on the mainpage for notable teams. No refs have been added to this page, and it consists of self discription and promotion and links to their own blog/website.Fuzbaby (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly not notable. Less members than a classroom and nothing else to make it special. • Anakin (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable secondary sources mentioning this fan group, thus failing WP:RS, WP:V and WP:GNG. Also fails notability for non-commercial organisations at WP:CLUB. --Jimbo[online] 08:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Mayve deserves a passing mention on the Islanders article, but other than that doesn't appear to be notable. GiantSnowman 10:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.