Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orangehaus Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 22:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Orangehaus Records

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non notable college record label no significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources fails WP:ORG Mo ainm  ~Talk  22:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — Mo ainm  ~Talk  22:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — Mo ainm  ~Talk  22:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable coverage.-- Gordonrox24 &#124; Talk 23:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with GordonRox24. Endofskull (talk) 23:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There are two reliable sources included, Billboard and The Times. One of the links even leads to an article done by a local news station. The page has creditability and should be kept. It is informational letting people know where artists such as John McLaughlin have come from as well as informs students about potential in music programs at Universities.Meghan solo (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into Anderson University, I agree with Meghan solo that there is coverage, but it doesn't seem notable enough to have it's own article. -- Worm   15:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.