Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orangey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Orangey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be entirely sourced from IMDB which isn't reliable and appears to have some significant inaccuracies. Mangoe (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * keep Is notability achieved?  We have a category "animal actors",  so we seem to recognise that "cats in films" can be a notable subject. This particular cat was in, amongst others, Breakfast at Tiffany's and so would appear to meet the bar for acting notability. The rationale "delete because it's inaccurate" would seem to indicate that there are other, perhaps contradictory, sources out there other than IMDB. If so, it would be better to improve the article so as to make use of them, rather than to nominate for deletion because they exist but aren't being used. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * withdraw There seems to be adequate sourcing and demonstration of notability at this point. Mangoe (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.