Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oratorical Interpretation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Oratorical Interpretation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No coverage outside plainly unreliable websites and some miscellaneous descriptions of the event. No significant third-party coverage of any kind. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, the only coverage available consists of primary or unreliable sources, GNG failure. Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.